I am not talking about Billy's blog, but the name itself. Lately people are using the term Classical Arminianism, Reformed Arminianism, Arminianism of the heart... Do these terms do Arminians a disservice?
I think the point of these terms is to get back in touch with our roots and point out that Arminius himself was completely orthodox. But what are we distinguishing areselves from? Is there a type of Arminianism other than Classical Arminianism? Are these other Arminians open theists, anti-trinitarians, liberals and Pelagians? Have the Calvinists been right all along about Arminianism and Classical Arminians only represent a small subset of Arminianism?
I think not. Arminianism is Classical Arminianism.